SM

.
.
TCA INSTANT!SMOnline

 

 

 





Answer To Your Questions

Q: Please clarify which it is - guard rails above 5'11"  or is it 9'11" ? 
My guys that went to the OSHA 10 hour class were told 10'. We got nailed 
for 6' violations yesterday. So I need clarification.

A:

OSHA only has jurisdiction over employers and their employees exposed to hazards during their routine work process.  However, some provisions of OSHA regulations are indirectly intended to create a "standard" of sorts for manufacturers.  We see this in the negotiated steel erection rule with anchorage issues, and we see it in the upcoming negotiated crane rule requiring insulators in the red zones near power lines.  If manufacturers don't manufacture the steel with the anchorage the contractor needs, he'll lose business.  Same on the crane manufacturer's since most contractors won't want equipment that they have to add a $16,000 insulator to before they can use it.  And so it is with scaffolds.  The 10 foot rule exists to distinguish when any surface can now qualify as a scaffold that is subject to subpart L's requirements.  They can make scaffolds that are shorter and have all the same scaffold components (guardrails, toeboards, etc.) but 10 feet is when the device, whatever you call it, can be held subject to scaffold requirements.

Call OSHA 10 times, get 10 answers, but here's the one you can bank on because I've handled hundreds of OSHA cases in 20 years----if, for any reason you use a device that you call a scaffold, and it is under 10 feet, so you don't attach the guardrails or toeboards or access ladders that the manufacturer designed to go with it, then you have failed to use it as designed and it is now NOT a scaffold, but a walking, working surface.  Your duty to provide fall protection doesn't change over 6 feet, only the regulation to be cited changes--from subpart L to subpart M.  If the scaffold is designed by the manufacturer to stand less than 10 feet and is NOT manufactured with any guardrail components, and has manufacturer instructions to use it as a "scaffold" without guardrails, then please submit the manufacturer information to TCA for research and to get an opinion from OSHA technical services on how they will categorize this piece of equipment -- as a scaffold, or a walking, working surface.  Even Baker and Web Tex scaffolds, commonly used without their guardrails (though this is improper) and at lower levels than 10 feet, or even 6 feet, are actually designed and manufactured with guardrail components and carry warnings on their equipment requiring and recommending the use of guardrails at all times.  WebTex has a warning on some equipment recommending that all the scaffold components (guardrails, etc.) be used over four feet (this was read to me today by a contractor reading directly off a WebTex scaffold warning).  OSHA globally incorporates manufacturer instructions and design by reference throughout the Code of Federal Regulations.  Because of this, any failure to follow a manufacturer's original design or instruction is citable under OSHA, no matter what the OSHA regulation says.

I wish an OSHA 10-hour course, or any other safety class out there, could tell employers everything they need to know.  Then I could retire.


Q:

On our drug policy it speaks of NO handguns. Several folks have handgun or Peace Officer certifications. Have you provided an amendment for anyone in the past?  The big concern is if the owners disallow firearms and then we get a "NUT CASE" or a robber, if anyone gets hurt then they can be sued for not allowing folks to protect themselves. ( catch 22) Please advise.

A:

No, we have never written an amendment or created any variance allowing handguns to be carried into the workplace.  Most major owners, if not all Fortune 100 owners in Houston, prohibit workers and contractor workers from carrying handguns (or any weapons) into the workplace.  Permits to carry guns are specifically not sufficient to supercede this requirement and typically notices are posted.  Peace officers that are not engaged in either their voluntary duty capacity or paid duty capacity are not entitled to any exceptions.  In other words, if you volunteer, or are paid, as a peace officer at times (or hold a certification or license relative to such a position) but you are working as a

  contractor, then your peace officer job status and its privileges (i.e. carrying a gun) do not apply at the worksite where you are engaged in construction work and not officer duty.  TCA has never encountered any owner requiring pre-qualification questionnaires in the city of Houston that would consider a drug policy adequate without this firearm clause in it.  In 1991, when the practice of drug testing became mainstream (after the Federal Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988 and the development of the TWC in place of the disbanded labor board) TCA argued with attorneys to leave the gun clause OUT because it had nothing to do with drugs or alcohol; however, eventually TCA had to put this clause back in so the policies would meet the owner's safety requirements.  I suspect the owners have evaluated their risks and determined that the benefit to safety by disallowing guns (and other weapons) far outweighs the remote risk of a weapon wielding individual wandering into the jobsite and opening fire on workers.  They feel their risk is remote and manageable and security interests are better served by banning weapons.  In the post-9/11 era, they are even less tolerant of weapons on site.  Besides, can you imagine the chaos if the response to one person wielding a gun is for a room full of construction workers to open fire on him like a scene out of a Clint Eastwood movie?  Doesn't seem like the best response to the risk anyway, does it?




HOME: ABOUT US : MEMBERSHIP : SERVICES : FAQS : STORE : CONTACT

Our phone number is (713) 263-7661, or email us at Inbox@tcamembers.com
© Copyright 2005 The Compliance Alliance (TCASM)